Evaluation target: “Write something about history, but keep it brief and interesting.”
Component-by-component assessment
| Component | Classification | Score (0–10) | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Persona / Role | Missing | 1 | No explicit role or identity for the assistant is provided. |
| 2. Objective / Task | Partial | 4 | A task exists (“write something about history”) but it’s vague on topic scope and deliverable specifics. |
| 3. Input Variables | Missing | 0 | No placeholders, parameters, or user-provided inputs are defined. |
| 4. Constraints / Rules | Partial | 4 | Contains a minimal constraint (“brief and interesting”) but lacks concrete limits (e.g., length, format). |
| 5. Audience | Missing | 1 | No target audience or user context is identified. |
| 6. Style / Tone | Partial | 3 | “Interesting” implies engaging tone, but offers no clear stylistic guidance beyond that. |
| 7. Context / Background | Missing | 0 | No background information, time period, or thematic focus is provided. |
| 8. Examples / Few-shot | Missing | 0 | No examples or pattern-setting samples included. |
| 9. Safety / Guardrails | Missing | 0 | No boundaries or sensitivities (e.g., accuracy, citations, sensitive topics) are specified. |
| 10. Non-goals / Out-of-Scope | Missing | 0 | No exclusions or limits on content scope are stated. |
Overall results
- Average score: 1.3 / 10
- Final qualitative rating: Poor Prompt
Notes
- The prompt is minimally actionable and leaves most structural elements undefined, which can lead to variable outputs and mismatched expectations.